Sport News

Boston Bruins’ Collapse Against Ottawa Raises Alarms as Goaltending and Coaching Decisions Come Under Fire

What began as another regular-season matchup at TD Garden ended as a brutal reality check for the Boston Bruins — one that has reignited uncomfortable questions about consistency, goaltending management, and coaching decisions as the season inches toward a pivotal stretch.

There have been several losses this season that Bruins fans would rather forget. Some came early, others during a frustrating losing skid that exposed cracks in the team’s structure. But few defeats have felt as humiliating — or as alarming — as the ones delivered by the Ottawa Senators.

On October 27, the Senators stunned the Bruins with a lopsided 7–2 victory. That game was widely labeled an embarrassment. Nearly two months later, Ottawa returned to TD Garden and somehow managed to top it, dismantling Boston 6–2 in a performance that felt every bit as damaging — if not worse.


A familiar nightmare repeats itself

The Bruins entered the rematch hoping to prove the first blowout was an anomaly. Instead, it became a troubling pattern.

From the opening moments, Ottawa dictated the pace. Drake Batherson wasted no time, opening the scoring just 1:30 into the game and immediately silencing the home crowd. The Senators never loosened their grip.

Claude Giroux and Fabian Zetterlund struck late in the first period, scoring just over three minutes apart to make it 3–0. Any hope of a reset vanished early in the second period when Tim Stutzle and Dylan Cozens scored two goals just 19 seconds apart — a sequence that effectively ended the contest.

For Bruins fans, the most unsettling part wasn’t just the scoreline. It was how helpless the team looked while it unfolded.


Goaltending struggles take center stage

In the October loss, Jeremy Swayman bore the brunt of the criticism after being left exposed by defensive breakdowns. This time, the spotlight shifted to Joonas Korpisalo, making his return against his former team.

Korpisalo lasted just 27:03. He allowed five goals on a barrage of high-quality chances before being pulled midway through the second period. While it’s fair to note that several goals came off defensive lapses, the reality is unavoidable: the Bruins needed a save — any momentum-changing save — and they didn’t get one.

Yes, Korpisalo could have stopped one or two of the goals. But he didn’t. And in games like this, that difference matters.

With the score spiraling and the building deflated, head coach Marco Sturm made a reluctant move, calling on Swayman in relief.

“I didn’t really want to do that,” Sturm admitted afterward.

But circumstances forced his hand — and that admission may be as concerning as the loss itself.


Questionable lineup and workload decisions

Sturm has earned praise this season for many of his strategic choices. But his handling of the goaltending rotation over the past week has drawn mounting scrutiny.

Swayman started four games in six days — an aggressive workload for any NHL goaltender, especially one who showed signs of fatigue in a 5–4 shootout loss to the Vancouver Canucks the night before. That performance looked less like a bad game and more like a goalie who needed rest.

Instead of addressing that fatigue earlier, Sturm opted to give Swayman Sunday “off” — only to throw him back into the fire after Korpisalo imploded.

The result? A bruised goaltending situation heading into the final game before the holiday break.


The standings loom ominously

The Bruins now face a dangerous stretch. They host the Montreal Canadiens next — a game that technically isn’t must-win, but emotionally and psychologically feels close to it.

A loss would mean finishing the homestand at either 1–3–1 or 1–2–2. From there, the schedule offers little mercy: a five-game road trip awaits immediately after the break.

In a tightly packed standings race, even a brief slide can snowball. Lose momentum now, and the Bruins risk watching teams leapfrog them while confidence erodes.

If that happens, fingers will inevitably point toward the bench.


Ottawa exposes deeper issues

What makes the Senators losses particularly troubling is not Ottawa’s talent — it’s how easily they exploited Boston’s weaknesses. Speed through the neutral zone. Quick puck movement in the offensive end. Relentless pressure that forced mistakes.

Ottawa made the Bruins look slow, reactive, and disjointed — not once, but twice.

That raises a difficult question: were these games simply bad nights, or are they warning signs of systemic problems that better teams will also exploit?


Accountability moment arrives

The Bruins are not in crisis — not yet. But they are at a crossroads.

The talent is there. The roster is capable. But hockey seasons often turn on moments like this — moments where complacency is punished and adjustments become mandatory.

Marco Sturm’s decisions over the coming weeks will matter. Goaltending workload, defensive pairings, and lineup consistency will all be under the microscope. So will the team’s response.

Good teams bounce back. Great teams learn.

Right now, the Bruins must do both — or risk watching a promising season slip into something far more uncomfortable.

One thing is clear after Sunday night at TD Garden: the losses to Ottawa were not just defeats on the scoreboard. They were warnings.

And whether Boston listens may define what comes next.

LEAVE A RESPONSE

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *