BREAKING: NASCAR has decided to end its partnership with Stonewall and will no
longer allow rainbow-themed car designs or imagery, including rainbow decals,
shoelaces, and armbands, following a meeting with the league’s board of directors
on Monday.

Dale Earnhardt Jr. has sporen o..t, emphasizing his commitment to inclusivity while
respecting the league’s new decision

In a move that has sent shockwaves through the world of motorsports, NASCAR announced on Monday, September 15, 2025, that it will no longer allow teams to paint their cars with rainbow designs or other rainbow-themed imagery, including decals, during races. This decision follows a meeting with team captains from all NASCAR teams and marks a significant departure from the sport’s previous efforts to support LGBTQ+ inclusivity. The announcement also revealed that NASCAR would end its partnership with Stonewall, a leading LGBTQ+ advocacy organization that had been associated with the league for several years.

NASCAR’s Rationale

NASCAR’s leadership explained that the decision was made to maintain a focus on
the competition with the league’s primary goal being athletic peiformance rather
than political or social messaging

According to an anonymous NASCAR executive, “”NASCAR is committed to
maintaining a uniform and professional appearance on the track.

This is not a statement against any community but rather a decision to keep the
focus on racing.”

The new rule prohibits rainbow designs or imagery on cars, uniforms, and
accessories during official races, although drivers and teams are still permitted to
express their support for .GBTQ+ causes in non-competitive spaces, such as
during press conferences or off-track charity events.

This decision follows a similar move by the Premier League, which also ended its
1G year partnership with Stonewall and prohibited the use of rainbow armbands by
players.

NASCAR’’s move, however, has ignited immediate debate, with critics claiming that
the sport is taking a step back in its commitment to inclusivity.

Cne of NASCAR’s most prominent figures, Dale Earnhardt Jr. , was quick to
respond to the league’s decision.

In a statement issued after the announcement, Earnhardt Jr.

expressed disappointment but also emphasized his commitment to finding
alternative ways to support the LGBTQ+ community within the sport.

“Racing is about bringing people together, and we’ve always been proud of the
diversity within our fanbase and our teams,” Earnhardt Jr.

said. “This decision doesn’’t change who we are as an organization or what we
stand for.

We’ve always supported inclusivity, and we will continue to do so off the track.

It’s unfortunate that we won’t see rainbow designs anymore, but we’ll find other
ways to make sure everyone feels respected and valued in NASCAR.”

Earnhardt Jr.”

s comments reflect a balanced approach, acknowledging the league’s new policy
while stressing the importance of inclusivity off the field.

However, his response has sparked mixed reactions from fans and players, some
of whom feel that NASCAR is distancing itself from the LGBTQ+ community.

Driver and Fan Reactions

The decision has ignited a wave of reactions from both drivers and fans.

Many drivers, particularly those who have been vocal about their support for
LGBTQ+ inclusion, expressed disappointment that the league had made such a
dramatic shift.

One anonymous driver shared, “Having rainbow-themed designs on our cars was a
small but meaningful way to show support for the LGBTQ+ community.

It’s tough to see that taken away, especially when it meant so much to so many
people.”

Other drivers, however, voiced support for NASCAR’s decision, arguing that racing
should remain free of political or social symbols.

The debate has become a focal point of conversation, with hashtags
like #NASCARBansRainbow and #Supportinclusivity trending on social media.

Fans of NASCAR are also expressing strong opinions, with some supporting the
decision, saying that sports should focus solely on the competition.

Stonewall and Advocacy Groups React

Stonewall, which had been closely associated with NASCAR for several years,
issued a statement condemning the move.

A Stonewall spokesperson said, “Rainbow imagery has been an important symbol
of inclusion in motorsports.

This decision sends a harmful message to LGBTQ+ athletes and fans who see
NASCAR as a space for representation and equality.”

Other advocacy groups have followed suit, criticizing the league for what they see
as a retreat from inclusivity.

“It’s disappointing to see a sport as prominent as NASCAR take a step back on this
issue,” said an LGBTQ+ rights advocate.

“Rainbow designs on cars were a small but powerful visual representation of
NASCAR’’s commitment to the LGBTQ+ community.”

Broader Implications for NASCAR and Sports

NASCAR’s decision has come at a time when many sports leagues worldwide are
grappling with how to balance social advocacy with the need to maintain focus on
competition.

NASCAR has previously shown a willingness to embrace social causes, including
supporting social justice movements and LGBTQ+ rights.

However, this ban on rainbow-themed imagery raises concerns about the league’s
priorities moving forward.

Critics argue that the decision could alienate a significant portion of NASCAR’’s
fanbase, particularly LGBTQ+ fans who saw the rainbow imagery as a form of
inclusion.

Supporters of the decision, however, contend that it reinforces the idea that
motorsports should be a unifying space free of divisive political or social symbols.

The debate surrounding NASCAR’s approach to inclusivity is likely to continue, with
potential for player-led initiatives, protests, or even sponsor pressure to reverse the
decision.

Looking Ahead

As the controversy unfolds, all eyes will be on how NASCAR teams, drivers, and
stakeholders respond. Dale Earnhardt Jr.

and other drivers may continue to explore alternative ways to show support for the
LGBTQ+ community, such as through charity events, public statements, or
grassroots campaigns.

While the league has restricted visible support during races, the conversation about
NASCAR’s role in social advocacy is far from over.

This decision has also set the stage for a broader conversation about the role of
sports in promoting inclusivity.

How NASCAR navigates this issue in the years to come could have lasting
implications for the sport’s image and its relationship with diverse fan groups.