Ten years ago, Elon Musk and Sam Altman stood on the same side of history.

On December 11, 2015, OpenAI was unveiled as a nonprofit research laboratory, founded by a group of Silicon Valley heavyweights including Musk, Altman, Peter Thiel, and Reid Hoffman. Their shared promise was ambitious and idealistic: to develop artificial intelligence for the benefit of all humanity, free from commercial pressure and profit-driven incentives.

The group pledged $1 billion to ensure that AI’s future would not be controlled by a small number of corporations or governments. At the time, it felt like a moral stand against the excesses of Big Tech.

A decade later, that vision has all but collapsed.

Today, Musk and Altman are no longer collaborators. They are adversaries—locked in a bitter personal, legal, and ideological conflict—while leading rival companies at the heart of a global AI arms race now approaching $1 trillion in market value.

The Fork in the Road

OpenAI’s early years were defined by scarcity, experimentation, and principle. In 2016, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang personally delivered a prototype DGX-1 supercomputer, worth $300,000, to OpenAI’s modest San Francisco office. The machine had cost Nvidia billions to develop, and Huang later admitted he was stunned that its destination was a nonprofit.

“Elon was the only one who wanted it,” Huang recalled. When Musk explained that OpenAI was a nonprofit, Huang said the blood drained from his face.

Behind the scenes, however, idealism was already under strain.

Training cutting-edge AI models required computing power at a scale few had anticipated. The nonprofit structure—once a badge of ethical purity—was becoming a constraint.

By 2017, Musk’s frustration boiled over.

In a now-famous internal email, he warned OpenAI’s founders that he would stop funding the organization if it continued drifting toward becoming a conventional tech startup. “This is the final straw,” Musk wrote. Sam Altman responded the next morning with reassurance: “I’m still very excited about the nonprofit structure!”

But the fracture was irreversible.

The Breakup

In early 2018, Musk resigned from OpenAI’s board, publicly citing potential conflicts of interest as Tesla ramped up its own AI ambitions. Privately, the split was far more complex.

OpenAI would soon pivot decisively toward commercialization, forging a deep partnership with Microsoft and restructuring its governance to allow for-profit operations under nonprofit control.

Musk walked away—and did not look back quietly.

In 2024, he sued OpenAI and Altman, accusing them of abandoning the organization’s founding mission and transforming a public-benefit project into a profit-driven monopoly aligned with Microsoft. He attempted to block OpenAI’s conversion into a for-profit entity and even launched a $97.4 billion bid to acquire the company outright.

By October, OpenAI completed a capital restructuring, consolidating control under a nonprofit parent while operating commercially as OpenAI Group PBC, a public-benefit corporation.

The war lines were drawn.

Two Companies, Two Philosophies

Today, OpenAI stands as one of the fastest-growing commercial entities in history. Its private valuation has surged to $500 billion, with nearly all of that value created since the launch of ChatGPT just three years ago. The chatbot now serves over 800 million weekly users, making it one of the most widely adopted software products ever.

But growth has come at an extraordinary cost.

OpenAI is burning cash at an unprecedented rate, planning infrastructure investments that could exceed $1.4 trillion, largely for hyperscale data centers and high-performance AI chips. It is competing aggressively with Big Tech giants and their silicon partners, echoing past tech booms where rapid expansion preceded painful consolidation.

Meanwhile, Musk has built xAI, OpenAI’s most ideologically direct rival. The company is expected to close a $15 billion funding round this month at a pre-money valuation of $230 billion. xAI is tightly integrated with Musk’s broader ecosystem, including X (formerly Twitter), which serves as both a data source and distribution platform.

The rivalry is no longer symbolic. It is structural.

The Expanding Battlefield

OpenAI and xAI are not alone.

Google, Meta, Anthropic, and others are pouring capital into AI models as the industry evolves beyond text-based chatbots toward AI-generated video, agentic systems, and enterprise productivity tools requiring vastly greater computing power.

Anthropic—founded in 2020 by former OpenAI researchers Dario and Daniela Amodei—has emerged as another formidable contender. Backed by Microsoft and Nvidia, Anthropic may soon reach a valuation of $350 billion, with its Claude models competing directly against OpenAI’s GPT systems.

Sam Altman’s strategy is clear: outspend the competition.

While Anthropic has committed roughly $100 billion to AI compute over several years, OpenAI’s infrastructure ambitions dwarf that figure. It is a massive bet that demand for AI services will continue to grow at an exponential pace.

A High-Stakes Gamble

Not everyone is convinced.

“OpenAI has played a huge role in AI history and always will,” said Gil Luria, an equity analyst at D.A. Davidson. “The question is whether it becomes the Google of AI—or the Netscape.”

Others warn that OpenAI’s spending plans rely on “fantastical commitments” and fragile assumptions about long-term revenue. Altman disagrees. He has repeatedly stated that demand is “extreme,” projecting $20 billion in annual revenue by the end of this year and hundreds of billions by 2030.

That optimism has rippled through the tech ecosystem.

Oracle signed a $500 billion, five-year infrastructure deal with OpenAI. Chipmakers AMD and Broadcom have factored OpenAI-driven demand into long-term forecasts. Yet investor anxiety is growing. Oracle’s stock recently fell 11% after missing revenue expectations, dragging down Nvidia and other AI-related stocks amid concerns over mounting debt.

Red Alert

Internally, OpenAI is not immune to pressure.

Altman recently declared a “red alert” inside the company, reallocating resources to focus on making ChatGPT faster, more reliable, and more personalized, while delaying work on advertising, healthcare, shopping agents, and a personal assistant known as Pulse.

The move followed Google’s release of Gemini 3, intensifying competition. OpenAI responded with ChatGPT-5.2, a faster and more powerful reasoning model aimed at professional users, and announced a $1 billion content and equity deal with Disney centered on its AI video generator, Sora.

Altman insists OpenAI will emerge from red alert by January.

From Idealism to Empire

What makes this story extraordinary is not just the money involved—but how far it has drifted from its origin.

OpenAI began as a moral experiment: could humanity build transformative AI without surrendering control to profit and power?

Ten years later, its founders are fractured, its mission contested, and its future bound to the largest capital investments the tech industry has ever seen.

Musk and Altman are no longer arguing about code. They are arguing about who should control intelligence itself.

Once allies, now enemies, they are shaping a future neither can afford to lose.

And in the race for AI supremacy, ideals may prove to be the most expensive casualty of all.

https://www.youtube.com/watch/RivoGAgZldg