In a shocking announcement, former President D T.r.u.m.p revealed that he would not be attending Super Bowl 60, which is scheduled to take place in San Francisco (Santa Clara) in February 2026. His decision to skip the highly anticipated event comes as a surprise to many, particularly given the prominence of the Super Bowl and its long history of attracting notable personalities from various sectors, including politics, entertainment, and sports. However, Trump’s reasoning behind his absence was anything but a typical political move.

A Clash of Personalities and Politics

Trump’s decision to not attend Super Bowl 60 was largely influenced by two main factors: the game’s location in the liberal city of San Francisco and the choice of performers for the opening and halftime shows. According to Trump, his refusal to participate in the event was not only a personal preference but also a political stance against what he perceives as the growing cultural divide within the United States, particularly in the entertainment industry.

“I’m not going to attend the Super Bowl this year,” Trump said in a statement issued from his Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Florida. “The game is being played in San Francisco, a city that is becoming more and more distant from the values that made this country great. And then, you have these performers, Bad Bunny and Green Day, both of whom have been extremely vocal in their criticism of me. It’s a disgrace that they’ve been chosen to represent the event.”

The Super Bowl’s Controversial Location: San Francisco

One of the primary reasons for Trump’s decision was the location of Super Bowl 60. San Francisco, a city often seen as a stronghold of liberal and progressive politics, has been a point of contention for the former president for years. During his time in office, Trump frequently criticized cities like San Francisco, accusing them of being too lenient on issues like immigration, crime, and political correctness.

“San Francisco is a city that’s been run into the ground by radical leftists,” Trump continued. “It’s a place where illegal immigration runs rampant, and the streets are filled with homelessness. How can we, as a country, celebrate something as monumental as the Super Bowl in such a place?”

While some critics of Trump’s comments believe that his views are colored by his personal grievances with the city’s political climate, others argue that the location of the game has become a symbol of a larger cultural divide. The San Francisco Bay Area, which includes cities like Oakland and San Jose, has long been known for its liberal politics, its vocal support of LGBTQ+ rights, and its progressive stance on environmental issues. For Trump, who often touts his conservative values and “Make America Great Again” platform, attending a Super Bowl in a city with such a stark political identity was untenable.

A Disagreement Over Performers: Bad Bunny and Green Day

Trump’s second reason for skipping the Super Bowl was the choice of performers for the opening and halftime shows, which have long been a central element of the event. This year, the NFL announced that Latin music sensation Bad Bunny and the iconic punk rock band Green Day would headline the performances, a decision that quickly became the subject of heated controversy.

Bad Bunny, a Puerto Rican rapper and reggaeton artist, has made headlines in recent years for his outspoken political views. He has been a vocal critic of Trump, particularly regarding his stance on immigration and the treatment of Puerto Rico after Hurricane Maria. The rapper’s public comments and activism have made him a controversial figure in the eyes of Trump’s supporters, many of whom feel that Bad Bunny represents a form of cultural opposition to the president’s policies.

Green Day, on the other hand, has a long history of criticizing Trump and his administration. The band, known for their politically charged lyrics, has been openly critical of the former president, with frontman Billie Joe Armstrong frequently calling out Trump’s rhetoric on issues like race, climate change, and democracy. Green Day’s songs like “American Idiot” have been seen as anthems of resistance against Trump’s leadership, making their selection for the halftime show all the more contentious.

“I object to them,” Trump stated firmly. “I think it’s a terrible choice. It just sows hatred. It’s awful. Why would you choose artists who have so much animosity towards the president and towards the American people? It’s disrespectful. It sends the wrong message to the country, especially at an event as significant as the Super Bowl.”

Cultural and Political Backlash

Trump’s comments on the performers have sparked a backlash from both his critics and supporters. On one hand, those who share his political views argue that his decision to boycott the Super Bowl is a principled stance against what they see as the increasing politicization of entertainment. Many Trump supporters have expressed frustration over the growing trend of celebrities and musicians using their platforms to speak out against conservative values.

On the other hand, critics of Trump’s decision have pointed out that his refusal to attend the Super Bowl may be seen as an attempt to stoke division and further polarize the American public. “It’s disappointing that he can’t set aside his political differences for something as important as the Super Bowl,” said one political analyst. “This is about sports, entertainment, and unity. The Super Bowl should bring people together, not create further animosity.”

Some have even suggested that Trump’s comments about Bad Bunny and Green Day are a reflection of his own insecurity and inability to accept criticism. “Bad Bunny and Green Day have every right to speak their minds, just as Trump has the right to speak his,” said a source close to the music industry. “But to claim that their performances are ‘sowing hatred’ is an overreaction. It’s a reflection of how deeply divided the country is right now.”

The Future of the Super Bowl and Politics in Entertainment

Trump’s decision to boycott the Super Bowl also raises questions about the future of politics in sports and entertainment. In recent years, athletes, musicians, and actors have become increasingly vocal about their political beliefs, with many using their platforms to speak out on issues ranging from social justice to climate change. This has led to debates about whether entertainment should remain apolitical or if it’s important for public figures to use their platforms for activism.

The choice of performers at major events like the Super Bowl has long been a subject of debate. Historically, the halftime show has featured a range of artists from different genres, from rock to pop to hip-hop. The NFL has always been careful to choose performers who will appeal to a broad audience, but in recent years, the selection of artists has become more controversial due to their political stances. Some argue that this trend reflects the growing intersection of politics and culture, while others see it as a dangerous shift towards divisiveness.

For Trump, the decision to boycott Super Bowl 60 is a reflection of his broader worldview, one that seeks to draw clear lines between “us” and “them.” By refusing to attend the game and speaking out against the performers, Trump is reinforcing his position as an outsider to the cultural elite and doubling down on his populist message.

Conclusion: A Polarizing Decision

Trump’s announcement that he will not attend Super Bowl 60 is a move that further underscores the polarization that has come to define American politics. Whether one agrees with his views or not, it is clear that his decision is about more than just the location of the game or the artists chosen to perform. It’s about the cultural and political divide that continues to shape the country, with Trump standing firmly on one side of that divide.

As Super Bowl 60 approaches, it remains to be seen whether Trump’s boycott will inspire others to follow suit or whether it will be remembered as just another chapter in the ongoing battle for the soul of America. One thing is for certain: the intersection of politics and entertainment will continue to be a hotly debated issue, with the Super Bowl serving as just one of many battlegrounds in the fight for cultural influence.